Use case

Executive / Operations Information Triage

Agents watch the inboxes, channels and dashboards, resolve the routine items, and surface only what needs a decision, with the context attached.

The business problem

Operators and executives read far more than they act on. Email, Slack, tickets, call notes and dashboards all compete for attention, and the few items that matter are mixed in with the many that do not.

The cost is senior attention spent sorting, decisions made late because the signal was buried, and teams that route work by forwarding it to whoever seems right.

How it runs today

  • Shared inboxes and channels are read end to end by someone senior enough to know what matters.
  • Items are forwarded by hand, often to several people, and nobody is sure who owns them.
  • Leaders build their own picture of the week from scattered dashboards, threads and meetings.
  • Status reports are written by hand from the same sources every week.
  • Urgent items are found by luck or by escalation, not by design.
Who does what

Automate the work. Keep judgment human.

Plain automation where the logic is fixed. Agents where the input is messy. People wherever consequences or ambiguity rise.

Deterministic automation

  • Filtering known noise: notifications, auto-replies, duplicates and newsletters.
  • Routing by fixed rules where sender, form or ticket type already determines the owner.
  • Threshold alerts on metrics that already live in a dashboard.
  • Scheduled assembly of the data that goes into a recurring report.

Agents

  • Reading free-text messages and classifying them by type, urgency and owner.
  • Answering routine questions from approved sources and closing the item.
  • Summarizing long threads, call transcripts and ticket histories into what changed and what is needed.
  • Writing a daily or weekly brief: decisions waiting, risks rising, items overdue.

People stay responsible for

  • Priorities: what matters this week and what can wait.
  • Decisions the brief surfaces, and the replies on sensitive or political topics.
  • Anything involving personnel, legal exposure or a key relationship.
  • Defining what counts as urgent, and adjusting it when the agent gets it wrong.

Systems and integration

  • Email and shared inboxes
  • Slack or Teams
  • Ticketing and case management
  • Meeting notes and call transcripts
  • BI dashboards and operational reports

Validation and controls

  • Agents read only the inboxes and channels they are assigned to.
  • Auto-replies are limited to named, low-risk question types from approved sources.
  • Anything marked sensitive or uncertain goes to a person, not to a queue.
  • Every routing and reply decision is logged and can be reviewed.
  • Regular review of missed and mis-routed items to tune the rules.

What we measure

  • Attention hours recovered per week
  • Time to route an item to its owner
  • Items missed or answered late
  • Routine items resolved without a person
  • Time spent preparing recurring reports
How we would approach it

An example workflow design

Illustrative, not a client result. It shows where each responsibility sits.

Operations inbox and weekly leadership brief

Trigger: Messages arrive in the shared operations inbox and team channels.

Reference architecture

An illustrative design showing how we would approach the workflow. Not a client result.

  1. 1AutomationFilters notifications, duplicates and auto-replies, and routes items whose owner is fixed by rule.
  2. 2AgentClassifies the rest by type, urgency and owner, and links each to the related account or case.
  3. 3AgentAnswers routine questions from approved sources and closes them; drafts replies for the rest.
  4. 4HumanTeam leads review the urgent queue, send or edit drafts, and decide on anything sensitive.
  5. 5AgentEach week, writes a brief of open decisions, overdue items and recurring issues, with links to the source.
  6. 6HumanThe COO reviews the brief, sets priorities and assigns owners for the week.

Controls

  • Auto-replies only for named question types
  • HR, legal and key-account items always go to a person
  • Every brief item links to its source message
  • Monthly review of missed and mis-routed items

What we would measure

  • Hours spent reading and routing
  • Time to first response
  • Items missed or late
  • Time to prepare the weekly brief

Assess a workflow

Bring us one workflow that is slow, repetitive, error-prone or expensive. We'll help determine whether AI is actually the right lever.